New York: The Novel

Nav:Home > Literature & Fiction > British & Irish > New York: The Novel

Press:Doubleday Doubleday; First Edition edition (November 10, 2009)
Publication Date:2009-11-10
ISBN:9780385521383
Author Name:Edward Rutherfurd
Pages:880
Language:English

Content

The bestselling master of historical fiction weaves a grand, sweeping drama of New York from the city's founding to the present day.Rutherfurd celebrates America's greatest city in a rich, engrossing saga that showcases his extraordinary ability to combine impeccable historical research and storytelling flair. 
As in his earlier, bestselling novels, he illuminates cultural, social, and political upheavals through the lives of a remarkably diverse set of families.
As he recounts the intertwining fates of characters rich and poor, black and white, native born and immigrant, Rutherfurd brings to life the momentous events that shaped New York and America: the Revolutionary War, the emergence of the city as a great trading and financial center, the excesses of the Gilded Age, the explosion of immigration in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the trials of World War II, the near-demise of New York in the 1970s and its roaring rebirth in the '90s, and the attacks on the World Trade Center.
Sprinkled throughout are captivating cameo appearances by historical figures ranging from George Washington to Abraham Lincoln to Babe Ruth.New York is the book that millions of Rutherfurd's American fans have been waiting for.
A brilliant mix of romance, war, family drama, and personal triumphs, it gloriously captures the search for freedom and prosperity at the heart of our nation's history.

Review

“Like James Michener and Leon Uris, Rutherfurd does a magnificent job of packaging a crackling good yarn within a digestible overview of complex historical circumstances and events.” —Booklist"History has never been so fun to read....Rutherfurd's research is exhaustive....fun....This is history, but with a very readable story line."--USA Today

About the Author

EDWARD RUTHERFURD is the author of many books, including London, The Princes of Ireland, and The Rebels of Ireland.

From The Washington Post

From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by by Brigitte Weeks Readers who pick up "New York: The Novel" should be warned not to turn the pages asking, "Is it true?" Did Mohawk Indians really put together the steel framework for the Empire State Building back in 1929? Was there actually a famous Civil War photographer called Theodore Keller? Yes, for the Native American steelworkers, "sitting calmly on the girders as they were swung up to dizzying heights in the sky." No, for the photographer, although he somewhat resembles Mathew Brady and gives Rutherfurd the opportunity to describe the Civil War with a close-up lens. 
But analyzing the veracity of every incident will spoil the fun, and what makes this novel so entertaining is the riotous, multilayered portrait of a whole metropolis.
Rutherfurd offers the reader a chance to watch a rural outcrop grow into one of the world's greatest cities in a mere 350 years.
He delivers magnificently on the challenge; it is hard to imagine any other writer combining such astonishing depth of research with the imagination and ingenuity to hold it all together.
Enormous Brueghellike portraits are Rutherfurd's specialty.
His first novel, "Sarum," centered on the ancient circle of Stonehenge and was a surprise bestseller in 1987.
His second novel, "Russka," spanned 1,800 years from Tartars to Bolsheviks.
His novels are always comfortingly long, stuffed with detail and held together by families descending through the centuries.
His basic technique is to whip together the lives of representative fictional clans with a backdrop of facts into a smooth narrative.
This saga begins in New Amsterdam, an outpost of Dutch settlers, in 1664.
Those first Europeans push the original Indian tribe, the Manates, off the island inland, leaving "Manhattan," the corruption of the Indian name Manna hata, as their only legacy.
"New Amsterdam" morphs into "New York," as the Dutch in their turn are overrun by the British and the restored monarch, Charles II, turns his transatlantic territories over to his brother, the Duke of York.
The novel's founding father is Thomas Master, the estranged son of an English family of Puritan settlers from Boston.
He has an illegitimate Native American daughter and runs his household with the help of African slaves.
His slave Quash is well treated and encapsulates the less brutal side of slavery, but Quash's son, Hudson, is rented out to a vicious sea captain.
Hudson manages to escape, and hundreds of pages later we encounter one of his descendants tending bar in Five Points, the poverty-stricken neighborhood behind City Hall now known as the Bowery.
As the Master clan grows and thrives, passing entrepreneurial drive from generation to generation, the reader must pay attention because, with centuries to cover, Rutherfurd must skip whole decades.
In 1901 the Masters step aside for a few chapters to make room for the Caruso family, fresh from Italy.
Their lives bring into focus the struggles of the New York immigrant population, expanding daily in the early years of the 20th century.
They manage to get their "crazy" Uncle Luigi past the vigilant officials on Ellis Island and settle into tenement living.
Five-year-old Salvatore Caruso grows up to become a bricklayer, working on the Empire State Building, earning a princely $15 a day.
Successive generations of Masters make good marriages, raise families and earn lots of money.
They also lose it again in the 1907 and 1929 gyrations of the stock market.
Rutherfurd captures the panic and the losses in powerful scenes that uncannily mirror today's headlines.
"The market wasn't just falling, it was in headlong panic," thinks William Master, the head of the current generation of Masters, as he watches his fortune disappear.
He stands in the street and sees "a fellow come out of the Exchange and burst into tears.
An old broker he knew passed him and remarked, with a shake of the head: 'Ain't seen anything like this since the crash of 1907.' " Rutherfurd does not avoid conflict and violence among the less affluent city residents.
There are the draft riots of 1863 with scenes of angry workers attacking an orphanage for black children (sadly not fiction); a Caruso daughter works as a seamstress locked in the Triangle Shirtwaist factory that burned down in 1911.
As we move into the 21st century, the horrors of Sept.
11, 2001, are anticipated and painfully inevitable.
In the summer of 2009, Gorham Masters ponders why this city means so much to him.
After a stroll through the Strawberry Fields garden in Central Park, he muses about the future and the Freedom Tower being constructed at the site of the Sept.
11 attack.
"Two words: the one an invitation, the other an ideal, an adventure, a necessity.
'Imagine' said the garden.
'Freedom' said the tower.
Imagine freedom.
That was the spirit, the message of this city he loved." Page by page, detail by detail, Rutherfurd has magically captured this spirit.
His readers, even if they have never set foot on the island of Manhattan, will understand this crowded and multicultural city better than many who have spent their lives on Fifth Avenue, Broadway or Wall Street.
bookworld@washpost.com Copyright 2009, The Washington Post.
All Rights Reserved.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

 1664So this was freedom. 
The canoe went with the river's tide, water bumping against the bow.
Dirk van Dyck looked at the little girl and wondered: Was this journey a terrible mistake? Big river, calling him to the north.
Big sky, calling him to the west.
Land of many rivers, land of many mountains, land of many forests.
How far did it continue? Nobody knew.
Not for certain.
High above the eagles, only the sun on its huge journey westward could ever see the whole of it.
Yes, he had found freedom here, and love, in the wilderness.
Van Dyck was a large man.
He wore Dutch pantaloons, boots with turnover tops, and a leather jerkin over his shirt.
Now they were approaching the port, he had put on a wide-brimmed hat with a feather in it.
He gazed at the girl.
His daughter.
Child of his sin.
His sin for which, religion said, he must be punished.
How old was she? Ten, eleven? She had been so excited when he'd agreed to take her downriver.
She had her mother's eyes.
A lovely Indian child.
Pale Feather, her people called her.
Only her pale skin betrayed the rest of her story.
"Soon we shall be there." The Dutchman spoke in Algonquin, the lan­guage of the local tribes.
New Amsterdam.
A trading post.
A fort and little town behind a pal­isade.
But it was important, all the same, in the worldwide com mercial empire of the Dutch.Van Dyck was proud to be Dutch.
Their country might be small, but the indomitable Netherlanders had stood up to the mighty, occupying Spanish Empire, and won their independence.
It was his people who had constructed the great dykes to reclaim huge tracts of fertile land from the rage of the sea.
It was the maritime Dutch who had built up a trading empire that was the envy of the nations.
Their cities—Amsterdam, Delft, Antwerp—where the rows of tall, gabled houses lined stately canals and waterways, were havens for artists, scholars and freethinkers from all over Europe, in this, the golden age of Rembrandt and Vermeer.
Yes, he was proud to be Dutch.In its lower reaches, the great river was tidal.
This morning it was flow­ing down toward the ocean.
During the afternoon, it would reverse itself and flow back toward the north.The girl was looking forward, downstream.
Van Dyck sat facing her, his back resting against a large pile of skins, beaver mostly, that filled the center of the canoe.
The canoe was large and broad, its sides made of tree bark, sturdy but light.
Four Indians paddled, two fore, two aft.
Just behind them, a second boat, manned by his own men, followed them down the stream.
He'd needed to take on this Indian canoe to carry all the cargo he had bought.
Upriver, the late-spring sky was thunderous; above them, gray clouds.
But ahead, the water was bright.A sudden shaft of sunlight flashed from behind a cloud.
The river made a tapping sound on the side of the boat, like a native drum giving him warning.
The breeze on his face tingled, light as sparkling wine.
He spoke again.
He did not want to hurt her, but it had to be done."You must not say I am your father."The girl glanced down at the little stone pendant that hung around her neck.
A tiny carved face, painted red and black.
The face hung upside down, Indian fashion.
Logical, in fact: when you lifted the pendant to look at it, the face would be staring at you the right way up.
A lucky charm.
The Masked One, Lord of the Forest, the keeper of nature's balance.Pale Feather did not answer him, but only gazed down at the face of her Indian god.
What was she thinking? Did she understand? He could not tell.From behind the rocky cliffs that stretched up the western bank like high, stone palisades, there now came a distant rumble of thunder.
The little girl smiled.
His own people, the Dutchman thought, as men of the sea, had no liking for thunder.
To them it brought harms and fears.
But the Indians were wiser.
They knew what it meant when the thunder spoke: the gods who dwelt in the lowest of the twelve heavens were pro­tecting the world from evil.The sound echoed down the river, and dissolved in space.
Pale Feather let the pendant fall, a tiny gesture full of grace.
Then she looked up."Shall I meet your wife?"Dirk van Dyck gave a little intake of breath.
His wife Margaretha had no idea he was so near.
He'd sent no word ahead of his return.
But could he really hope to bring the girl ashore and conceal her from his wife? He must have been mad.
He twisted round, awkwardly, and stared down the river.
They had already reached the northern end of the narrow territory called Manhattan, and they were running with the tide.
It was too late to turn back now.Margaretha de Groot took a slow draw on the clay pipe in her sensual mouth, looked at the man with the wooden leg in a considering kind of way, and wondered what it would be like to sleep with him.Tall, upright, determined, with piercing eyes, he might be gray, and well into middle age now, but he was still indomitable.
As for the peg leg, it was a badge of honor, a reminder of his battles.
That wound might have killed some men, but not Peter Stuyvesant.
He was walking down the street with surprising speed.
As she gazed at the hard, polished wood, she felt herself give a tiny shudder, though he did not see it.What did he think of her? He liked her, she was sure of that.
And why shouldn't he? She was a fine, full-bosomed woman in her thirties with a broad face and long blonde hair.
But she hadn't run to fat, like many Dutchwomen.
She was still in good trim, and there was something quite voluptuous about her.
As for her liking for a pipe, most of the Dutch smoked pipes, men and women alike.He saw her, stopped, and smiled."Good morning, Greet." Greet.
A familiar form of address.
Like most Dutchwomen, Margaretha van Dyck was normally known by her maiden name, Margaretha de Groot; and that is how she had expected him to address her.
Of course, he'd known her since she was a girl.
But even so .
.
.
He was normally such a formal man.
She almost blushed.
"You are still alone?"She was standing in front of her house.
It was a typical Dutch town house, a simple, rectangular dwelling, two stories high, with wooden sides and its narrow, gabled end turned to the street.
This end displayed a handsome pattern of black and yellow brick.
A short stairway led up to the street door, which was large and protected by a porch.
This was the Dutch "stoop".
The windows were not large, but the ensemble was made impressive by the high, stepped gable that the Dutch favored, and the roof ridge was crowned with a weathervane."Your husband is still upriver?" Stuyvesant repeated.
She nodded.
"When will he return?""Who knows?" She shrugged.
She could hardly complain that her hus­band's business took him north.
The trade in furs, especially the all-important beaver pelts, had been so great that the local Indians had hunted their animals almost to extinction.
Van Dyck often had to go far north into the hinterland to get his supplies from the Iroquois.
And he was remarkably successful.But did he have to stay away so long? In the early days of their mar­riage, his journeys had only taken a couple of weeks.
But grad ually his absences had extended.
He was a good husband when he was at home, attentive to her and loving to his children.
Yet she couldn't help feeling neglected.
Only that morning her little daughter had asked her when her father would be home.
"As soon as he can," she had answered with a smile.
"You may be sure of that." But was he avoiding her? Were there other women in his life?Loyalty was important to Margaretha de Groot.
So it was not surpris­ing if, fearing her husband might be unfaithful, she told herself that he was morally weak and, dreaming of solace in more righteous arms, allowed a voice within her to whisper: "If only he were a man like Gover­nor Stuyvesant.""These are difficult times, Greet." Stuyvesant's face did not show it, but she could hear the sadness in his voice.
"You know I have enemies."He was confiding in her.
She felt a little rush of emotion.
She wanted to put her hand on his arm, but didn't dare."Those cursed English."She nodded.If the trading empire of the Dutch extended from the Orient to the Americas, the English merchants were not far behind.
Sometimes the two Protestant nations acted together against their common enemies, the Catholic empires of Spain and Portugal; but most of the time they were rivals.
Fifteen years ago, when Oliver Cromwell and his godly army took away King Charles of England's crown—and his head—the rivalry had intensified.
The Dutch had a lucrative slave trade between Africa and the Caribbean.
Cromwell's mission was clear."The slave trade must belong to England."Many honest Dutchmen wondered if this brutal trafficking in humans was moral; the good Puritans of England had no such doubts.
And soon Cromwell had taken Jamaica from the Spanish, to use as a slaving base.
When Cromwell had died four years ago, and a second King Charles had been restored to the English throne, the same policy had continued.
Word had already reached New Amsterdam that the English had attacked the Dutch slaving ports on the Guinea coast of Africa.
And the rumor across the ocean was that they wanted not only the Dutchman's slave trade, but his port of New Amsterdam as well.New Amsterdam might not be large: a fort, a couple of wind mills, a church with a pointed spire; there was one small attempt at a canal, more like a large ditch really, and some streets of step-gabled houses which, together with some modest orchards and allotments, were enclosed within a wall that ran from west to east across Manhattan's southern tip.
Yet it had a history.
Ten years before even the Mayflower sailed, the Dutch West India Company, seeing the value of the vast natural harbor, had set up a trading post there.
And now, after half a century of fits and starts, it had developed into a busy port with outlying settlements scattered for dozens of miles around—a territory which the Dutch called the New Netherland.It already had character.
For two generations the Dutch and their neighbors, the Protestant, French-speaking Walloons, had been fighting for independence from their master, Catholic Spain.
And they had won.
Dutch and Walloons together had settled in New Amsterdam.
It was a Walloon, Pierre Minuit—a name that was still pronounced in French, "Minwee"—who had bargained with the native Indians, four decades ago, to purchase the right to settle on Manhattan.
From its birth, the tough, independent spirit of these mixed Protestant merchants had infused the place.But above all, it had position.
The fort, to a soldier's eye, might not be impressive, but it dominated the southern tip of Manhattan Island where it jutted out into the wide waters of a magnificent, sheltered harbor.
It guarded the entrance to the big North River.And Peter Stuyvesant was its ruler.The English enemy was already close.
The New England men of Mass­achusetts, and especially of Connecticut with their devious governor, Winthrop, were always trying to poach territory from the outlying Dutch settlements.
When Stuyvesant built up the stout wall and palisade across the northern side of the town, the New Englanders were politely told: "The wall is to keep the Indians out." But nobody was fooled.
The wall was to keep out the English.The governor was still gazing at her."I wish that the English were my only enemy."Ah, the poor man.
He was far too good for them, the worthless people of New Amsterdam.The town contained some fifteen hundred people.
About six hundred Dutch and Walloons, three hundred Germans and almost as many En ­glish who'd chosen to live under Dutch rule.
The rest came from all parts of the world.
There were even some Jews.
And among them all, how many upright, righteous men? Not many, in her opinion.Margaretha was not a religious woman.
The Dutch Reform Church was stern and Calvinistic; she didn't always abide by its rules.
But she admired the few strong men who did—men like Bogard, the old dominie preacher, and Stuyvesant.
At least they stood for order.When Stuyvesant clamped down on the excessive drinking in the town, or forbade some of the more obviously pagan folk festivals, or tried to keep the town free of the foolish Quakers or wretched Anabaptists, did any of the merchants support him? Hardly any.
Not even the Dutch West India Company, whose servant he was, could be relied upon.
When a par­cel of Sephardic Jews arrived from Brazil, and Stuyvesant told them to go elsewhere, the company ordered him: "Let them in.
They're good for business."No one could deny that he'd been a fine governor.
The men who came before him had mostly been corrupt buffoons.
One idiot had even started an unnecessary war with the Indians that had nearly destroyed the colony.
But Stuyvesant had learned to rule wisely.
To the north, he kept the En ­glish at bay.
To the south, he had made short work of an upstart Swedish colony on the Schuylkill River when it had become an irritation.
He'd encouraged the sugar trade, and started to bring in more slaves.
Every ship from Holland brought, as ballast, the best Dutch bricks to build the city's houses.
The streets were clean, there was a little hospital now, and the school had a Latin master.Yet were the people grateful? Of course not.
They resented his rule.
They even thought they could govern themselves, the fools.
Were these men capable of governing? She doubted it.The worst of them had been a two-faced lawyer, van der Donck.
The Jonker, they'd called him: the squire.
He was the one who went behind the governor's back, who composed letters to the West India Company and published complaints—all to bring down Stuyvesant.
And for what? "The Jonker is a lover of liberty," her husband used to tell her.
"You're all fools," she would cry.
"He loves only himself.
He'll rule you in Stuyvesant's place if you give him half the chance."Fortunately the Jonker had failed to destroy Stuyvesant, but he'd man­aged to get his hands on a big estate north of the city.
He'd even written a book on New Netherland which her husband assured her was fine.
The wretch was dead and gone now—thank God! But the people of New Amsterdam still called his big estate "The Jonker's Land", as if the fellow were still there.
And his example had so infected the merchants that, in her opinion, Stuyvesant shouldn't trust any of them.The governor's hard eyes were fixed on her."Can I count upon you, Greet?"Her heart missed a beat.
She couldn't help it."Oh yes."He was happily married, of course.
At least, she supposed he was.
He and Judith Bayard lived up at their bouwerie, as the Dutch called their farms, with every appearance of contentment.
Judith was older than Peter.
It was she who'd nursed him back to health after he lost his leg, and married him afterward.
So far as Margaretha knew, he'd only once had an affair, and that had been when he was a young man, long before he met Judith.
A small scandal.
She thought the better of him for it.
If it hadn't been for that little scandal, he might have become a Calvinist minister like his father, instead of joining the West India Company and going to seek his fortune on the high seas."And your husband? Can I count on him?""My husband?" Wherever he might be.
Avoiding her.Well, that was about to change.
While he'd been away, she had given the matter some thought and formulated a plan for his future that would be more satisfactory.
It was lucky that Dutch custom gave women far more freedom—and power—than the women of most other nations.
And thank God for Dutch prenuptial agree ments.
She had some very def­inite plans for Dirk van Dyck, when he came home."Oh yes," she said.
"He'll do as I say.""I am going down to the fort," Stuyvesant said.
"Will you walk with me?"London.
A cheerful spring day.
The River Thames was crowded with ships.
Thomas Master gazed at the vessel before him and tried to decide.In his hand was the letter from his brother Eliot, telling him that their father was dead.
Tom was too honest to pretend he was sorry.
He was twenty-two, and now he was free.So which should it be? England or America?On his left lay the great, gray mass of the Tower of London, silent, giv­ing nothing away.
Behind him, as he glanced back, the long, high roof of Old St.
Paul's suggested disapproval.
But of what? Of himself, no doubt.
After all, he'd been sent to London in disgrace.Thirty years ago, when Adam Master from England's East Coast and Abigail Eliot from the West Country had first met in London, these two earnest young Puritans had agreed that England's capital was a shocking place.
King Charles I was on the throne; he had a French Catholic wife; he was trying to rule England like a despot, and his new henchman, Arch­bishop Laud, was determined to make all Englishmen conform to the high ceremonies and haughty authority of an Anglican Church that was papist in all but name.
After they married, Adam and Abigail had stuck it out in London for a few years, in the hope that things might get better.
But for Puritans the times had only got worse.
So Adam and Abigail Mas­ter had joined the great migration to America.Englishmen had been going to Virginia for two generations.
By the time Shakespeare's Globe Theater was performing his plays on the Thames's south bank, half the population of London were smok ing clay pipes of Virginia tobacco.
But the number who'd actually left for Virginia was still modest.
A few hardy souls had ventured to Massachusetts; other settlements had also started.
But it was hardly a migration.In the second half of King Charles's reign, however, something com­pletely different occurred.
The Puritans of England started leaving.
From the south, the east, the west, they gathered in groups, sometimes families, sometimes whole communities, and took ship across the Atlantic.
There was hardly a week when a vessel wasn't sailing from somewhere.
From the mid-1630s, King Charles of England lost about a fiftieth of all his sub­jects in this manner.
Gentlemen like Winthrop, young men of means like Harvard, merchants and craftsmen, laborers and preachers, with their wives and children and servants—they all took ship for America, to avoid King Charles and his Archbishop.
This was the first real peopling of the American colonies, and it took place in little more than a decade.King Charles never seemed to have felt any embarrassment at this loss.
Indeed, it wasn't a loss; more of a gain.
Rather than give him trouble at home, where he was trying to establish his authoritarian rule, they had obligingly gone to settle a huge new extension to his kingdom.
Wherever they went on this huge, uncharted American continent, the land was England's; for they were still all his subjects, every one.
As for the freedom of worship they enjoyed, it was out of sight, and could probably be cor­rected, later on.Adam and Abigail Master had gone to Boston.
There they had found the harsh, sometimes cruel godliness of the congregation to their liking.
They were not, after all, seeking tolerance; they were setting up God's kingdom.
And their elder son Eliot had followed them closely in this regard.
Studious, cautious, determined, Eliot was everything a Boston father could wish for.
But Tom had been another matter.Tom Master was a fair-haired, blue-eyed fellow.
Though he had slightly protruding teeth, women found him attractive.
As a little boy, he was slim, always on the move, inventive.
By the time he approached man­hood, his whole demeanour suggested a quick, good-humored sharpness.
He was full of vigor.
But his behavior and his choice of friends left much to be desired.For even in those early days, it had to be confessed, there were those— seafarers and fishermen, merchants and farmers, to speak nothing of the meaner sort—who were more concerned with the money to be made in Massachusetts than the saving of their souls.
The congregation imposed its will as much as possible, but there were many backsliders.And young Tom, to the great regret of his parents and of his brother Eliot, seemed destined to be heading straight for hell.
He did not work at his lessons.
He had the ability, but he would not apply himself.
He got drunk.
He kept bad company.
Once, he even missed Sunday worship.
And though his father had not spared the rod, he could see after a while that it was not a question of discipline, or precept.
There was something deep in Tom that his father did not know how to change.Adam Master had built up a good, sound practice as a lawyer.
He'd bought a farm.
He owned a ship.
Eliot had studied law, but wanted to preach.
Tom had been apprenticed to a merchant, and shown an aptitude for business.
That was something, at least.But two events had broken his father's heart.
The first had been when Abigail lay dying.
She had sent for her second son and, in the presence of his father, begged him to reform his life.
For his own sake, and to help her depart in peace, she begged him to promise her that he would never drink another drop of liquor in his life.
By that first step, she hoped, he might yet turn to better ways.
And what had he said?"Aw, hell, Ma.
You know I can't promise that." To his mother on her deathbed.
Adam could never forgive his son for this incident.
He did not quarrel with Tom.
He knew it was not what Abigail would have wished.
He was polite.
He did all that a father should.
But he knew that Tom was no good.So when Tom, at the age of nineteen, had enjoyed his first affair with the wife of a sea captain while that worthy man was away on a voyage— the captain of the very ship that Adam owned—his father managed to keep it quiet, for Eliot's sake.
But he told young Tom that he was to leave Massachusetts at once.
He had sent him, with a somewhat bleak letter of introduction, to a merchant he knew in London.
And with instructions not to return.Tom had been exiled back to the Old World.
He was not good enough for the New.Tom had liked London.
It suited him.
Though Cromwell and the Puri­tans had ruled England for a decade, the great experiment in ruling with­out a king had finally descended into confusion and martial law.
By the time Tom arrived, the English had restored the dead king's son, a second King Charles, to the throne.
And King Charles II was a merry fellow.
His younger brother James, the Duke of York, might be proud and stiff, but the King himself was flexible and cautious.
He had no wish to be turfed out like his father.
After years of exile, he wanted to have fun, and was glad if his subjects did too.
He loved chasing women, racing horses and visiting the theater.
He also took a genuine interest in science.The London Tom encountered was on the cusp between two worlds: the medieval, and the modern.
With Britain's overseas domains expand­ing, London's busy merchants had many opportu nities to make their for­tunes.
Rich aristocrats and gentlemen set the tone of fashion.
There were all kinds of entertainment.
For a year Tom had been very happy.And yet, after a while, he'd begun to yearn for America.
Not for Boston or his Puritan family, but for other things that were harder to define.
A sense of space, of new frontiers, of making the world anew.
A longing for freedom.
The freedom of the wilderness, perhaps.
He couldn't have put it into words. And now, with his father dead, he supposed there was nothing to stop him returning. There was another development, also, to be considered.
Here in Lon­don, there were rumors that King Charles II and his brother James were taking a new interest in the American colonies.
If so, that would be all the more reason for an ambitious young fellow like himself to look toward America again. So what should he do? Should he stay and enjoy the amusements of London, or venture across the ocean? It would be easy enough to tell the merchant he worked for that with his father dead, Eliot had summoned him home.
It certainly wouldn't take him long to pack his few posses­sions.
The ship in front of him was leaving tomorrow for Boston.
The captain had a berth for him.
Should he take it? He paused, laughed to himself, took out a coin and tossed it.
Heads: Boston.
Tails: London. Up in the north, the thunder spoke.
But ahead, as the big river reached the open waters of the harbor, was a lake of liquid gold. Van Dyck had tried to show Pale Feather the significance of the place the night before, using a map he had made himself.
Pointing with the stem of his pipe he had explained. "This line, which runs straight from top to bottom, is the North River.
Many days upriver there are big lakes and waterways that extend all the way up to the regions of ice.
To the left of the river"—he swept his pipe across the paper—"lies the whole continent of America.
To the right," and here he indicated a huge, triangular wedge of land, with its point down and its wide base sweeping out into the Atlantic, "are the territories of Connecticut, Massachusetts and many other places.
And here beside them is the great ocean that my people crossed." Tracing his pipe down to the southern tip of the wedge, he indicated another striking feature.
For here a long island, about twenty miles across and a hundred miles from end to end, lay moored as it were, alongside the wedge in the Atlantic.
Between this island and the mainland coast there was a long, sheltered sound.
"All round this area"—he indicated the bottom of the wedge and the neighboring end of the island—"your people dwelt for many genera­tions.
And this"—he tapped the southernmost point of the wedge—"is Manhattan."

Tags

Literature & Fiction,British & Irish,Historical,Genre Fiction,Family Saga,Contemporary



 PDF Download And Online Read: New York: The Novel



Comment

 
 

Comment List (Total:16)

  •     Disappointing - the characters in the novel are undeveloped and uninteresting. They remind me of relatives that stay too long at your place.
  •     After reading "Paris" I had high hopes for this novel. Unfortunately they were slowly and painfully ground down with a unbelievably boring, excruciating, minute, blow by blow of every battle in the American Revolution that dragged on forever. Nearly 1/3 of the book is taken by this event. There are many, many other events in New York's history that are of greater importance and are far more fascinating that this English writer only glances over. Entire swaths are glaringly absent. In fact, much of the book focuses on the history of the U.S./northeast rather than that of New York, which was so unbelievably irritating as that is not what the book promised to be.Nearly every major event after 1780 is glossed over because the English author couldn't stop talking about the English and the revolution. The choice to name the main character "Master" when they own slaves and go through the civil war was poor at best. There were a hundred other last names that wouldn't conjure up an image he clearly doesn't understand, and his justification of "master of the universe" was not one of them at all. The use of language during this time period was also overdone. Abolitionists, prohibition, suffrage, and the Great Depression were only briefly alluded to and therefore made trivial. Apparently, according to this account, world war 2 never existed for New York.Families were simply thrown away once the author is done making his point, never to hear from them again. Half the book preaches about the evils of slavery, but then the family is tossed aside midway. Same with the Native American and immigrant families. But somehow he felt it necessary to dwell, for nearly 300 pgs!!!, on the settlers and the revolution. And the author seems obsessed with objectifying woman and especially mentioning their breasts and figures. It's demeaning. He didn't do this in "Paris" where he created a strong female character.OMG at pg 753 I'm throwing this book away. They just cheapened the holocaust and looking ahead he's cheapened 9/11. Pathetic. I really expected more after Paris. Clearly as a preceding book he grew as an author. A deeply disappointing read. I've already purchased "London" and hope it's better.
  •     I wanted to like this book and I did enjoy the historic information regarding NY. However, I only made it half way through the book and gave up. The characters are not developed. The 'story' continually skips to the next generation before you become acquainted with the current one.
  •     Following a family for several generations made the history more interesting.
  •     Very well done as it portrays historical events from the days of New Amsterdam to the aftermath of 9/11 from the perspective of those living in New York City and how it effected...
  •     This is classic Rutherfurd, with families weaving a tapestry from the beginnings of the Dutch settlement of Manhattan, all the way up to the present day.
  •     Good historical fiction.
  •     Loved it
  •     The history of NY is done very well.
  •     I read this book back in 2012. I wasn't sure I was going to like this book. I had a bit of a problem getting started. However, I did enjoy it a lot! I loved the way Rutherfurd intermingled the fictional characters with the "real" history of New York. I found myself not wanting to put it down...and looking forward to picking it up again. Looking forward to reading a couple of other books by this author. I've since read RUSSKA. Also a good one, but this was better for me. It was about our own history in the USA!
  •     I'm happy all round!
  •     An excellent historical fiction. smooth reading. Get it now. JK
  •     Not sure what I was expecting, but as a fictionalized account of the abridged history of New York, it served it's purpose but it was a tad bit boring moving quickly from generation to generation so that the author could write about some blip on the historic map. So maybe geared more towards a less curious mind than mine. But I think if you just want a broad story without a lot of depth, it is an easy read. But don't expect anything earth shattering as the author sticks to a lot of the major events you probably already know about.
  •     I have read and loved all of Edward Rutherfurd's books (starting with Sarum, 20 years ago). When I heard that his latest book "New York" was being released a few weeks earlier in the UK than in the USA I ordered it from Amazon.co.uk as I was so eager to read it."New York" is just as good as Rutherfurd's other works. The author takes us on a 350 year ride through New York's history, from the 1600s to the present day. The fictional characters are well-developed and interesting and we follow them through multiple generations alongside all of the major events in New York's history. New Amsterdam, the Dutch, the War of Independence, Tammany Hall, the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, through to the inevitable and tragic conclusion at the World Trade Center. The chapter covering the Panic of 1907 is especially fascinating, given the obvious parallels with recent events: the near-collapse of the financial system, narrowly averted with millions of Government money, and the ability of J.P. Morgan himself to bring Wall Street's top money men together and convince them to do what was needed.With Rutherfurd's books it feels more like you're living through the history than reading a history book. There are many enjoyable storylines involving the fictional families, with the historical events as a backdrop, and several of them incorporate real characters from history. George Washington, Ben Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, Churchill's family, Boss Tweed, and many others, are all here.At school I thought history was a boring subject. But I found it very hard to put this book down, and very much missed my daily excursions into New York when I was finished.
  •     So disappointed after having loved SARUM. (1) Poor follow-up on characters that I actually liked and wondered: And what happened THEN? They simply dropped off the radar; (2) too much "God forbid," "Thank God" and "God knows" as his favorite swearing technique, which was overly used in some places and not at all and then would crop up again; (3) didn't bring up the assassinations of Lincoln, Garfield or JFK, and only just slightly mentioned McKinley's - all deaths greatly affecting Americans; and (4) conveniently slid through all the major wars after the Revolutionary War - I was disappointed how often 20 yrs. would go by and then a war was only mentioned AFTER it occurred...
  •     Loved it!! Such a great historical review

Relation Books

 

Legal Theory & Systems,Cooking Methods,Physics,Dentistry,Other Team Sports,Infantil y juvenil,Cars, Trains & Things That Go,Christian Denominations & Sects Book,。 FreeBook 

FreeBook @ 2018